Lansdown_Place_Covid19_update

Week Watch | 4 May 2020

Stock Take

“Baseball,” said Leo ‘The Lip’ Durocher, one of the greatest managers in the history of the game, “is like church. Many attend, but few understand.”

These days, however, few even attend. Taiwan’s government, which has done an exceptional job of suppressing the spread of the virus, reopened its high-profile baseball league back on 11 April. As yet, the only fans present have been cardboard cut-outs placed around the stadium seats to provide the impression of an audience. Is this how lockdown ends?

Last week, as the global number of cases passed 3.5 million, quite a few countries announced a softening of lockdown measures, and stocks rose in response. In the US, numerous states allowed business across several sectors to reopen shops, offices and factories. On Friday, the state of Texas allowed retail outlets, malls, restaurants, museums, libraries and cinemas to open at 25% capacity.

In Europe, meanwhile, several governments laid out lockdown-softening plans. Italy will open shops and tourist and cultural venues on 18 May, restaurants on 1 June, and schools after the summer holiday. May will also be an important month for lockdown loosening in France, Spain and Germany; the UK has yet to announce loosening measures.

Equities changeable
The combination of these announcements, and of support measures pledged by governments and central banks, was enough to buoy the S&P 500 for most of last week – ending its best calendar month since 1987. However, it ended the trading week marginally down as corporate results weighed on Friday trading, with S&P 500 constituent companies facing their worst earnings season in a decade; it was a similar tale on the FTSE 100. China’s CSI 300 and Europe’s EURO STOXX 50 both ended marginally up.

In fact, the FTSE 100 briefly broke through 6,000 points for the first time since early March. Its fall back came on announcements from major constituent companies that they were cancelling or cutting their dividend, among them Royal Dutch Shell, the largest company on the index.

Troubled sectors
Travel and tourism, two of the engines of energy sector growth, are not expected to recover any time soon. Indeed, those countries highly reliant on travel and tourism are particularly vulnerable even as the global economy gradually recovers, according to analysis last week by Capital Economics.

It sees three other groups of countries as particularly at risk of a “very protracted recovery”: those that fail to get the virus under control (it attaches warnings, on this score, to countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and the Indian subcontinent); those where the fiscal cost of current measures will overly strain debt-to-GDP ratios (southern Europe, Japan and, to a degree, the US); and those where a deeper downturn could be precipitated by a banking crisis (it cites Turkey’s banking sector as poorly capitalised). In short, it may be a global crisis, but the consequences are liable to vary widely between countries.

“Governments in developed markets have generally been quick to offer both direct assistance, such as wage subsidies, and big loan guarantee programmes, but the experience in emerging markets has been more mixed,” said Capital Economics. “This links to our previous point about debt sustainability; countries with weak public finances, such as Brazil, will generally be more reticent to stand behind their private sectors. Mexico and India have been slow to provide support, too.”

Central bank support
Support has, of course, come not only from governments through the crisis, but also through central banks – often in extraordinary form. Last week, the European Central Bank expanded its stimulus programmes, offering helicopter money for banks in the form of up to €3 trillion at negative rates. It also emphasised its willingness to use all its tools to avert a prolonged downturn, but skirted over the sensitive topic of how far it will offer a backstop for Italian debt.

The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, has been ditching its own rule book on who it lends to and what risk it takes on. Last week, it expanded its $600 billion lending scheme to incorporate larger businesses – those with up to $5 billion in turnover.

“The latest move will help a little bit,” said Pete Drewienkiewicz, Chief Investment Officer for Global Assets at Redington. “But it doesn’t do much [because] the programme is still being implemented by banks, who don’t really lend to small and medium-sized enterprises much anymore, and because it’s capped at six times leverage, which is a blunt measure that takes no account of business structure or profitability.”

Growth and companies
Indeed, despite the stock rallies, fresh indicators last week showed the scale of the economic damage suffered in recent months, with eurozone GDP down 3.8% and US GDP by 4.8%. That’s the biggest US quarterly fall since 2008, and the chief culprit was consumer spending. It may not get better quite yet, either; a White House senior advisor said last week that second quarter US GDP is likely to be between -20% and -30%.

It was a similar tale at a corporate level, with income investors feeling the pain of a record number of companies announcing dividend cuts (see In The Picture, below). Among the world’s largest companies, Apple was a notable disappointment on the results side, but still chose to raise its dividend significantly. Even Amazon, whose business model could even benefit from a lockdown economy, had mixed news to deliver to shareholders – sales surged but so did virus-related costs. Amazon’s CEO prefaced his announcement to shareholders with the words: “You may want to take a seat.” Its share price duly took a bow.

The recent turmoil has provided an unwelcome reminder of the risks in stock market investing. Over the short term, markets are prone to violent swings, in both directions. Traders rely on it to make money, but investors are wisest to ignore it.

But why do we invest? The simple objective is to grow our money to increase or maintain its spending power. That means achieving a return above inflation.

Research by Schroders shows just how much, historically, a long-term view increased the odds of making money and achieving that goal.

Looking back over 149 years of data on the US stock market shows that if you had invested for a month (bought and then sold a month later), in inflation-adjusted terms you would have lost money around 40% of the time. That’s 704 of the 1,790 months over that period.¹

 

S&P 500 Index discrete one-year returns

Apr 19 – Apr 20

Apr 18 – Apr 19

Apr 17 – Apr 18

Apr 16 – Apr 17

Apr 15 – Apr 16

0.2%

12.8%

12.6%

17.7%

0.5%

Source: Financial Express. Data shown in both tables is for the S&P 500 Index. Past performance is not a guide to future returns.

Over a year, you would have lost money in just over 30% of occasions; but that is still too short a time to invest in the stock market.

On a five-year horizon, the figure falls to 20%. But over 20 years – that’s 1,551 different rolling periods since 1871 – there was only one time when stocks lost money in inflation-adjusted terms. That was from July 1901 to June 1921.²

In comparison, if you had instead held your money in cash over all those different 20-year periods, you would have lost money in real terms on over 85% of occasions.³

The message is simple: if you invest short term, you significantly increase the risk of losing money. In uncertain times, it’s important we keep reminding ourselves that the financial goals for which we’re investing are not next month, but typically over a decade or so away.

The value of an investment with St. James’s Place will be directly linked to the performance of the funds selected and the value may fall as well as rise. You may get back less than the amount invested.

An investment in equities does not provide the security of capital associated with a deposit account with a bank or building society.

¹, ², ³ Schroders, April 202

In The Picture

Stocks performed impressively over the month, but oil provided the biggest swing.

  The Last Word

It was thanks to some wonderful, wonderful nursing that I made it. They really did it and they made a huge difference … I get emotional about it … but it was an extraordinary thing.
Boris Johnson on his time in St Thomas’ Hospital, London

The information contained is correct as at the date of the article. The information contained does not constitute investment advice and is not intended to state, indicate or imply that current or past results are indicative of future results or expectations. Where the opinions of third parties are offered, these may not necessarily reflect those of St. James’s Place.

FTSE International Limited (“FTSE”) © FTSE 2020. “FTSE®” is a trade mark of the London Stock Exchange Group companies and is used by FTSE International Limited under licence. All rights in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings vest in FTSE and/or its licensors. Neither FTSE nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the FTSE indices and/or FTSE ratings or underlying data. No further distribution of FTSE Data is permitted without FTSE’s express written consent.

© S&P Dow Jones LLC 2020; all rights reserved.

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email

You may also like

Lansdown_Place_market_update
St. James’s Place Insights
Desi

Week Watch | 21 September 2020

Stock Take A statement by the Federal Reserve, the US central bank, was the biggest driver of markets last week – mostly for what it

Read More »
Lansdown Place News
Desi

Financial Housekeeping

Graham Lewis in conversation with Rachel Hall on financial housekeeping and how to manage your financial affairs.

Read More »